Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed15 September 20213270934

3 Dell Lane, Stoneleigh, Surrey, KT17 2NE

demolition of existing building and the erection of a block of 9 apartments

Authority
Epsom and Ewell Borough Council
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Sabu R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
  • the effect of the proposed development on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers of Nos 84 and 86 Briarwood Road with regard to outlook and privacy
  • whether the proposed development would accord with the Council's development plan strategy for housing with regard to loss of employment use
  • whether any adverse effects of the proposal would significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits

What decided it

The significant harm to character and appearance combined with unacceptable harm to neighbouring privacy, when weighed against moderate housing benefits in the context of the tilted balance, resulted in adverse effects that significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits.

The significant harm to character and appearance and privacy carried significant weight against the scheme; the loss of employment use was offset to some degree by an extant permission for conversion to a single dwelling; the proposal's contribution of nine dwellings and associated social and economic benefits carried moderate weight; the adverse effects significantly and demonstrably outweighed the benefits when assessed against the Framework as a whole.

Framework references: 11

Plan policies cited: Policy DM9, Policy DM10, Policy DM24, Policy CS11

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.