Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed8 November 20213271061

44 Hartley Hill, Purley, CR8 4EN

alterations, erection of a two storey side and rear extension, single storey side extensions, alterations to the main ridge and erection of two rear dormers, conversion to form 5 No. self-contained flats; 1 x 3-bed, 1 x 2-bed and 3 x 1-bed, with associated cycle and refuse stores, alterations to existing vehicular access and provision of associated car parking

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
McCreery D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surroundings, including in relation to trees
  • The effect of the vehicular access arrangements in terms of highway safety
  • Whether an acceptable standard of accommodation would be provided for future occupants

What decided it

The harmful effect on character and appearance through inadequately designed waste storage and loss of a street tree, combined with insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the vehicular access arrangements would not detrimentally affect highway safety, outweighed the housing benefits.

The benefits of housing provision and social and economic benefits did not provide material considerations that would outweigh the conflict with the development plan in relation to character and appearance and highway safety.

Framework references: 8, 131

Plan policies cited: Policy DM13, Policy DM28, Policy D3, Policy G7, Policy SP4, Policy DM10, Policy DM29, Policy DM30, Policy T4, Policy T6, Policy SP2.8, Policy D5, Policy D6, Policy T5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.