Planning appeal decision
The Hayloft Ring O Bells Lane, Lathom, Ormskirk, L40 5TE
Planning appeal 3271110 at The Hayloft Ring O Bells Lane, Lathom, Ormskirk, L40 5TE (West Lancashire District Council) was dismissed on 13 December 2021 by Inspector Kirby R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies; and if so the effect on the openness of the Green Belt.
Single storey extension to existing dwelling to provide new entrance hall, living space, dining area and conservatory to the side and rear
- Authority
- West Lancashire District Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Kirby R
- Postcode
- L40 5TE
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies; and if so the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property, with particular regard to its design and size
- The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of nearby occupiers, with particular regard to privacy
- Whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm would be clearly outweighed by other considerations, and if so, whether this would amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the proposal
What decided it
The proposal constitutes inappropriate development in the Green Belt that would reduce openness and harm the character and appearance of the host property, and the personal circumstances and other considerations advanced do not clearly outweigh this harm to justify very special circumstances.
The substantial harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and reduction in openness, together with harm to character and appearance, was not clearly outweighed by the appellant's personal circumstances, potential permitted development rights, or space standards considerations, and therefore very special circumstances did not exist.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GN1Policy GN3POLICY GB4
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 11
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in West Lancashire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed13 October 202660137566 Moss Lane, Bickerstaffe, L39 0EX
- Allowed5 October 20266010014Land at Heathey Lane, Shirdley Hill, Halsall, West Lancs, L39 8SH
- Dismissed22 September 20266007428Land Adjacent to Model Farm, Plex Lane, Halsall, Ormskirk, L39 7JY
- Dismissed15 September 202660121883 Broad Lane, Downholland, Ormskirk, L39 7HS
- Allowed14 September 20266007163Prince Williams Inn, Beacon Lane, Dalton, WN8 7RU
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®