Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed14 December 20213271352

10 Roman Road, London, W4 1NA

Planning appeal 3271352 at 10 Roman Road, London, W4 1NA (London Borough of Hounslow) was dismissed on 14 December 2021 by Inspector Phillips B, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the existing property, street scene and Bedford Park Conservation Area.

the excavation and construction of a single storey basement underneath the existing building footprint of the property and partly under the side garden, with front and side light wells and one walk-on glass paving light to side garden

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Phillips B
Postcode
W4 1NA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the existing property, street scene and Bedford Park Conservation Area

What decided it

The front lightwell would make the presence of a basement obvious and uncharacteristic of the conservation area, causing less than substantial harm to its significance that is not outweighed by the private benefits to the appellants or the limited public benefits of the scheme.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the Bedford Park Conservation Area, a matter of considerable weight, outweighed the private benefits of additional accommodation to the appellants and the limited public benefits of improved landscaping.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CC1Policy CC2Policy CC4Policy SC7
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

698 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Hounslow

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed26 October 20266015572
    3 Chatsworth Crescent, Hounslow, TW3 2PE
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266011172
    45 Colonial Road, Feltham, TW14 8AA
  3. Dismissed23 October 20266011171
    45 Colonial Road, Feltham, TW14 8AA
  4. Allowed21 October 20266013999
    1 Cassiobury Avenue, Feltham, TW14 9JE
  5. Dismissed19 October 20266015127
    251 Jersey Road, Isleworth, TW7 4RF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.