Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 November 20213271476

315 High Road, ILFORD, IG1 1NR

change of shop front to provide access to first floor erection of two storey rear extension to create two studio flats

Authority
London Borough of Redbridge
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jones M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether or not adequate living conditions would be created for future users, with particular regard to daylight, outlook, outside space and storage
  • the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the occupants of 313b and 317a High Road, with particular regard to outlook and light

What decided it

The failure to create adequate living conditions for future users, particularly regarding outlook, outside space and storage for the rear studio flat, brought the scheme into conflict with the development plan, and the modest benefits did not outweigh this conflict.

The modest benefits of providing an additional residential unit and business extension would not outweigh the conflict with the development plan arising from inadequate living conditions for future users.

Framework references: 130

Plan policies cited: Policy LP23, Policy LP26, Policy LP29

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.