Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 October 20213271488

Land South of, Carlton Road, Kelsale Cum Carlton, Saxmundham, IP17 2NP

the erection of dwelling with garage (all matters reserved)

Authority
East Suffolk
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Reed D

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would comprise an acceptable form of development having regard to the settlement pattern, the character and appearance of the area and the policies of the development plan

What decided it

The proposal would lead to the coalescence of Carlton and Kelsale villages and cause significant harm to the character and appearance of the area, including damage to the historic parkland setting and the avenue of Lime trees, which outweighed the benefits of additional housing delivery.

The benefits of housing delivery and economic benefits were outweighed by the harm to settlement pattern, character and appearance, and conflict with development plan policies protecting settlement separation and heritage assets.

Plan policies cited: Policy 3.3, Policy 5.3, Policy 5.3(g), Policy 5.4, Policy 10.4, Policy 10.5, Policy 11.8

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.