Town Planner Pro
Free trial
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 March 20223271572

Unit C7 Angel Road Works, Advent Way, London, N18 3AH

Planning appeal 3271572 at Unit C7 Angel Road Works, Advent Way, London, N18 3AH (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 9 March 2022 by Inspector Wyatt G, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development on industrial floor space within a strategic industrial location.

a “change of use from storage warehouse (Class B2 and B8) to bar restaurant (Class E)

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
leisure-sport · Change of use
Inspector
Wyatt G

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development on industrial floor space within a strategic industrial location
  • the effect of the development on the viability and vitality of Enfield town centres
  • the effect of the development on highway safety and parking
  • whether the development provides adequate cycle parking facilities

What decided it

The development would result in the loss of industrial floorspace within a strategic industrial location and would constitute a main town centre use (bar and restaurant) in an unsuitable location without a sequential test assessment, conflicting with core development plan policies protecting industrial land and directing such uses to town centres.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Core Policy 14Core Policy 17Core Policy 18Core Policy 24Core Policy 25Policy DMD 19Policy DMD 21Policy DMD 23Policy DMD 25Policy DMD 32Policy DMD 45Policy DMD 47Policy DMD 48Policy E4Policy E5Policy T4Policy T5Policy T6Policy T7Policy EL15
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 87Paragraph 92

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

Appeals plan, £15 a month

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

280 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  2. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  3. Allowed28 August 20266008361
    9 The Spinney, Winchmore Hill, London, N21 1LL
  4. Dismissed20 July 20266010350
    19 Wilbury Way, London, N18 1BU
  5. Dismissed3 June 20266004803
    1 Moffat Road, London, N13 4SA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.