Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision17 December 20213271638

Crantock, South Road, Liphook, GU30 7HS

Planning appeal 3271638 at Crantock, South Road, Liphook, GU30 7HS (East Hampshire District Council) was allowed in part (a split decision) on 17 December 2021 by Inspector Law T, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and the host dwelling.

for a two storey front and side extension and single storey rear "open area" extension following demolition of existing garage and link building. Rendering of external walls at ground floor level and replacement of existing tile hanging and roof tiles. Replacement of windows with new powder coated aluminium windows

Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Law T
Postcode
GU30 7HS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area and the host dwelling

What decided it

The extensions would appear subservient to the host dwelling through their set-down design and would not harm the character and appearance of the area, whereas the entrance gates would introduce a prominent feature at odds with the soft green boundary treatments of South Road.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
East Hampshire District Local Plan: Joint Core Strategy 2014 Policy CP29East Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Reviews (2006) Policy H9East Hampshire District Local Plan: Second Reviews (2006) Policy HE2Residential Extensions and Householder Development Supplementary Planning Document (2018)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

13 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in East Hampshire District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed29 October 20266013353
    85 Chase Road, Lindford, Bordon, GU35 0RS
  2. Allowed29 October 20266013368
    9 Nightjar Road, Bordon, GU35 0GJ
  3. Allowed28 October 20266012533
    362 Catherington Lane, Catherington, Waterlooville, PO8 0TU
  4. Dismissed27 October 20266011297
    Land Rear of 74 - 76 Sunderton Lane, Clanfield, PO8 0NT
  5. Allowed12 October 20266006152
    Hurlands, Gentles Lane, Passfield, Liphook, GU30 7RY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.