Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed18 October 20213271657

Land at Buckstones Road, Shaw, Oldham, OL2 8LJ

a dwellinghouse with lower ground floor and associated garden and parking area

Authority
Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Johnson W

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposed development would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt
  • the effect of the proposed development on openness of the Green Belt
  • if the proposal is inappropriate development, whether harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify the development

What decided it

The presence of an extant fallback permission for a larger scheme, combined with the proposed development's superior design approach and comparable scale, clearly outweighed the harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness, establishing very special circumstances.

The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and loss of openness was clearly outweighed by the other considerations, particularly the realistic fallback position of the extant previous scheme and the design improvements of the proposed development, establishing very special circumstances.

Framework references: 11, 56, 145, 148, 149

Plan policies cited: Policy 22 of the Council's Local Development Framework, Development Plan Document, Joint Core Strategy and Management Policies 2011

Judgments cited: Turner v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and East Dorset Council [2016] EWCA Civ 466

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.