Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed23 November 20213271816

32 Hesper Mews, LONDON, SW5 0HH

creation of roof terrace with access from second floor, replace rooflight with opening skylight, and install 1.1m metal railings, painted black

Authority
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Morgan R

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the host property and the Courtfield Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular regard to privacy, noise and disturbance

What decided it

The established presence of roof terraces as a feature within the conservation area, combined with the proposed terrace's recessive design and set-back position, meant it would preserve rather than harm the character and appearance of the building and conservation area whilst not causing unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions.

Plan policies cited: Policy CL8, Policy CL1, Policy CL2, Policy CL3, Policy CL9, Policy CL11, Policy CL5

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.