Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed5 October 20213271821

42, The Crescent , Maidenhead, SL6 6AH

the erection of a two-storey side extension, and first floor front extension, following demolition of existing single storey side element to the existing dwelling

Authority
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Parsons J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effects of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • the living conditions of the occupiers of the neighbouring properties on Marlow Road, having regard to outlook and privacy

What decided it

The considerable depth and bulk of the side extension adjacent to the common boundary would be cramped and domineering, detrimentally eroding the spacious quality of the area and causing significant overbearing impact and loss of outlook to neighbouring residents.

The benefits of more efficient land use and lack of neighbour objection were outweighed by the significant and permanent harm to the character and appearance of the area and the living conditions of neighbouring residents.

Plan policies cited: Policy DG1, Policy H14, Principle 10.1 of the Borough Wide Design Guide 2020

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.