Planning appeal decision
Red House Farm Red House Lane, Elstead, Godalming, GU8 6DR
Planning appeal 3271908 at Red House Farm Red House Lane, Elstead, Godalming, GU8 6DR (Waverley Borough Council) was dismissed on 6 September 2022 by Inspector Woodwards O, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including on the landscape and scenic beauty of the Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (the AONB).
the erection of extensions and alterations to 2 existing barns to form 1 dwelling following demolition of existing American barn; erection of extension to nissen building to provide ancillary accommodation; demolition of existing outbuildings and landscaping
- Authority
- Waverley Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Woodwards O
- Postcode
- GU8 6DR
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including on the landscape and scenic beauty of the Surrey Hills Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (the AONB)
- whether or not the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, with particular regard to the exception criteria set out at paragraphs 149(c) and (g) of the National Planning Policy Framework (the Framework)
- the effect of the proposal on biodiversity, with particular regard to protected species and the Thursley, Hankley & Frensham Commons Site of Special Scientific Interest (the SSSI)
What decided it
The harm to the landscape and scenic beauty of the Surrey Hills AONB provided a clear reason for refusal that outweighed the limited housing and economic benefits.
the harms identified, particularly to the AONB, outweighed the relatively limited benefits of housing delivery and economic benefits, so the appeal was dismissed
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy TD1Policy D1Policy D4Policy RE2Policy NE1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 81Paragraph 147Paragraph 148Paragraph 149Paragraph 176Paragraph 180
- Judgments
- Lee Valley Regional Park Authority, R (on the application of) v Epping Forest District Council & Anor (Rev 1) [2016] EWCA Civ 404; Britannia Assets (UK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWHC 1908 (Admin)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Waverley Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Dismissed22 October 20266013698Markwick Farmhouse, Markwick Lane, Godalming, GU8 4BE
- Dismissed5 October 20266012552Dene End, Sands Lane, Tilford Nr Farnham, GU10 2BA
- Dismissed5 October 20266011947Land off Station Road, Hydestile, Godalming, GU8 4DB
- Dismissed5 October 20266009555Combe Farm, Alldens Lane, Godalming, GU8 4AP
- Dismissed22 July 20266008792Mossy Copse, Smithwood Common Rd, Cranleigh, GU6 8QR
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®