Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 October 20213271950

Flat 3, New End, London, NW3 1JE

Planning appeal 3271950 at Flat 3, New End, London, NW3 1JE (London Borough of Camden) was dismissed on 18 October 2021 by Inspector Witherley S, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal property, including whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Hampstead Conservation Area in which it is located.

Erection of a bi-sloped combination roof with a crown top, dormer window, 2x rooflights and installation of chimney stack to side elevation

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other minor developments
Inspector
Witherley S
Postcode
NW3 1JD

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the appeal property, including whether the proposed development would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Hampstead Conservation Area in which it is located

What decided it

The unaltered roof profile of properties Nos 9-15 is of heritage value worthy of preservation, and the proposed development would cause less than substantial harm to the conservation area with no public benefits to justify that harm.

The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area was not outweighed by any public benefits, as the personal benefits to the appellant did not constitute material public benefits.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D1Policy D2Policy DH1Policy DH2
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

525 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Camden

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed13 October 20266013300
    166 Grafton Road, London, NW5 4BA
  2. Allowed12 October 20266007435
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  3. Allowed12 October 20266007433
    Footpath Adjacent, 2 Castlehaven Road, London, NW1 8QU
  4. Allowed12 October 20266007308
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY
  5. Allowed12 October 20266007299
    Camden Road, Outside No.'s 84 - 92, London, NW1 9DY

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.