Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed16 November 20213272111

30 Hazel Road, Dartford, DA1 2SE

Planning appeal 3272111 at 30 Hazel Road, Dartford, DA1 2SE (Dartford Borough Council) was dismissed on 16 November 2021 by Inspector Szymanski D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the area.

Erection of a house on a garden including driveways (dropped kerb) and parking spaces

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Szymanski D
Postcode
DA1 2SE

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the area
  • whether the development would provide satisfactory living conditions for the future occupiers of the new dwelling with particular reference to external space provision, daylight, and outlook
  • whether the development would provide satisfactory living conditions for the occupiers of No 30 Hazel Road with particular reference to external space provision

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the area and failure to provide satisfactory living conditions for the new dwelling's occupiers in respect of private outdoor space provision outweighed the limited benefits of the development.

the significant harm to character and appearance and inadequate private outdoor space for the new dwelling outweighed the limited benefits of housing delivery, economic benefit, and more efficient use of land

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DP2Policy DP5Policy DP6Policy DP7Policy DP8Policy CS1Policy CS10b)Housing Windfall Supplementary Planning Document (2017)

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

133 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Dartford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed27 October 20266013958
    25 Main Road, Longfield, DA3 7QT
  2. Dismissed25 September 20266011893
    25 Essex Road, Dartford, DA1 2AU
  3. Dismissed18 September 20266011087
    37 Fawkham Avenue, Longfield, DA3 7HS
  4. Dismissed18 September 20266010288
    St Albans House, 98 East Hill, Dartford, DA1 1SB
  5. Split Decision17 September 20263372973
    145 Dartford Road, Dartford, DA1 3EW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.