Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed8 December 20213272128

Black Horse Tower, Holbrook House and Churchwood House, 116 Cockfosters Road, London, EN4 0DY

Planning appeal 3272128 at Black Horse Tower, Holbrook House and Churchwood House, 116 Cockfosters Road, London, EN4 0DY (London Borough of Enfield) was allowed on 8 December 2021 by Inspector Scriven M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the existing buildings, the street scene and the Metropolitan Green Belt.

external alterations to buildings involving removal and replacement of existing facades involving re-cladding and replacement windows and doors

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Scriven M
Postcode
EN4 0DY

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including the existing buildings, the street scene and the Metropolitan Green Belt
  • Whether the proposed development would effect the significance of the Grade II listed Cockfosters London Regional Transport Station, and preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Trent Park Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposal would result in betterment to the character and appearance of the existing buildings and street scene without harming the Green Belt or heritage assets, thereby according with the development plan and Framework policies on design quality and heritage conservation.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CP30Policy CP33Policy DMD37Policy DMD83Policy CP31Policy DMD44Policy D1Policy D3Policy HC1
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

325 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.