Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 October 20213272451

7, High Street, Camberley, GU15 3QU

Planning appeal 3272451 at 7, High Street, Camberley, GU15 3QU (Surrey Heath Borough Council) was dismissed on 6 October 2021 by Inspector Szymanski D, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the host building and the area.

Roof extension and first and second floor rear extensions to provide two additional flats

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Szymanski D
Postcode
GU15 3QU

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the development upon the character and appearance of the host building and the area
  • whether the development would provide suitable living conditions for the future occupiers of flat 2 with reference to internal space provision

What decided it

The significant harm to the character and appearance of the host building and the High Street, caused by the incongruent double stepped mansard roof form, demonstrably outweighed the limited benefits of the development even under the tilted balance.

The limited benefits of two new dwellings and small economic benefit were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the significant harm to the character and appearance of the host building and the area, resulting in dismissal despite the tilted balance applying due to insufficient housing land supply.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy TC1Policy TC4Policy TC11Policy TC12Policy DM9
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 130
Judgments
Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

90 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Surrey Heath Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed1 October 20266014361
    17 Roundway, Camberley, GU15 1NR
  2. Dismissed18 September 20266012106
    2 Killy Hill, Chobham, GU24 8RF
  3. Dismissed9 September 20266007519
    Laurels, Salisbury Terrace, Mytchett, GU16 6DB
  4. Dismissed20 August 20266010038
    122a, Hurstwood Manor, Upper Chobham Road, Camberley, GU15 1EJ
  5. Dismissed1 July 20266003913
    Wilds, The Folly, Lightwater, GU18 5XA

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.