Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 November 20213272455

136A New Cross Road, LONDON, SE14 5BA

addition of two new floors and creation of one new flat

Authority
London Borough of Lewisham
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Change of use
Inspector
Russell M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the Hatcham Conservation Area
  • whether the proposal would provide suitable living conditions for future occupants with particular regard to the provision of private outdoor space

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area's character and appearance, combined with the failure to provide private outdoor space for future occupants, could not be outweighed by the scheme's limited benefits.

The benefits of the scheme, including heritage improvements and provision of one additional flat, were outweighed by the less than substantial harm to the conservation area's character and appearance, to which great importance and weight must be attached.

Framework references: 196

Plan policies cited: Policy 15 (High quality design for Lewisham), Policy 16 (Conservation areas, heritage assets and the historic environment), Policy 30 (Urban design and local character), Policy 31 (Alterations and extensions to buildings including residential extensions), Policy 36 (New development, changes of use and alterations affecting designated heritage assets and their setting: conservation areas, listed buildings, schedule of ancient monuments and registered parks and gardens), Policy D6 (High quality and standards), Policy 32 (Housing design, layout and space standards)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.