Planning appeal decision
Cromer Hyde Farm, Lemsford, Welwyn Garden City, Hatfield, AL8 7XD
Planning appeal 3272746 at Cromer Hyde Farm, Lemsford, Welwyn Garden City, Hatfield, AL8 7XD (Welwyn Hatfield Council) was dismissed on 28 October 2021 by Inspector Aqbal M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework, 2021 and relevant development plan policies.
creation of a compound and the installation of 2no. telecommunications equipment containers, electric meter cabinet and associated fencing
- Authority
- Welwyn Hatfield Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- telecoms · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Aqbal M
- Postcode
- AL8 7XD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt having regard to the Framework, 2021 and relevant development plan policies
- the effect of the development on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
- if the development would be inappropriate, whether any harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The failure to clearly demonstrate that sites outside the Green Belt cannot be used for the In-Line Amplifier, combined with the speculative nature of one unit, meant the benefits did not clearly outweigh the identified harm to Green Belt openness and inappropriateness, so very special circumstances did not exist.
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and reduction in openness was not clearly outweighed by the economic, social and environmental benefits of the telecommunications network, as the site search was not sufficiently robust and alternative locations outside the Green Belt had not been adequately ruled out.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GBSP1Policy R21Policy D1Policy D2Policy RA10
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 137
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Welwyn Hatfield
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Dismissed5 October 202660098922A Whitehill, Welwyn, AL6 9AF
- Dismissed9 September 20266010292Rose Cottage, Kentish Lane, Hatfield, AL9 6JP
- Dismissed28 May 2026600320349 The Ridgeway, Cuffley, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, EN6 4BD
- Dismissed27 May 20266003536East Lodge, Judge's Hill, Northaw, Potters Bar, Hertfordshire, EN6 4NL
- Planning permission granted6 March 2026335467120 Ayot Green, Ayot St. Peter, Welwyn, AL6 9AB
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®