Planning appeal decision
The Stables,, Caldecote Lane, Bushey, WD23 4EF
Planning appeal 3272945 at The Stables,, Caldecote Lane, Bushey, WD23 4EF (Hertsmere Borough Council) was dismissed on 9 December 2021 by Inspector O'Doherty A, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and the effect on the openness of the Green Belt.
demolition of an existing dwelling house and replacement with two detached houses
- Authority
- Hertsmere Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- O'Doherty A
- Postcode
- WD23 4EF
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt, and the effect on the openness of the Green Belt
- the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including its effect on trees
- whether the proposal would provide adequate living conditions for future occupiers of the scheme, with particular reference to sunlight and the provision of private amenity space
- the effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers, with particular reference to privacy and outlook
- if the proposal would be inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations, so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it
What decided it
The harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness and the unacceptable harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupiers were not clearly outweighed by the moderate benefits of the proposal, so very special circumstances did not exist.
The substantial weight given to harm to the Green Belt and the unacceptable harm to neighbouring living conditions were not clearly outweighed by the moderate weight afforded to housing choice and mix and compliance with development plan standards, so the appeal was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CS13Policy SADM23Policy SADM12Policy SADM30
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 149Paragraph 149dParagraph 149gParagraph 148Paragraph 130
- Judgments
- Tandridge DC v SSCLG & Syrett [2015] EWHC 2503; Dyer v Dorset CC (1988); McAlpine v SSE (14/11/94)
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Hertsmere
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed17 August 20266008668Stables West Of Green Street, Shenley, WD7 9BA
- Allowed23 March 20263374962Land South of Shenley Hill, Radlett, WD7 7EL
- Allowed16 March 20266003108Glaze Restaurant Land Adj Manor Hotel, Edgwarebury Lane, Elstree, Hertfordshire, WD6 3RE
- Allowed16 January 20263368845Land West Of,Hilfield Lane, Aldenham, Hertfordshire, WD25 8DD
- Notice varied and upheld10 October 20253331271Land to North East Side of Stag Hill, Potters Bar, EN6 5QS
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®