Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 August 20213273078

22 East Street, SOUTHWOLD, IP18 6EH

to replace lean-to with flat roof

Authority
East Suffolk
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Lock H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the dwelling and the Southwold Conservation Area

What decided it

The private benefits of increased bedroom headroom and fire safety do not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the dwelling and the Southwold Conservation Area.

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the heritage asset and the character and appearance of the conservation area outweighed the private benefits of increased headroom and fire safety.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: Policy WLP8.29, Policy WLP8.38, Policy WLP8.37, Policy WLP8.39

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.