Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 January 20223273146

Radford House, 200 Radford Boulevard, Nottingham, NG7 5BA

Planning appeal 3273146 at Radford House, 200 Radford Boulevard, Nottingham, NG7 5BA (Nottingham City Council) was dismissed on 25 January 2022 by Inspector Cooper P, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: Whether the proposed development would comply with the limitations and conditions applicable to development permitted under Class AA of Schedule 2, Part 20 of the GPDO, namely the age of the building.

erection of two storey upward extension for residential accommodation

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Cooper P
Postcode
NG7 5BA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed development would comply with the limitations and conditions applicable to development permitted under Class AA of Schedule 2, Part 20 of the GPDO, namely the age of the building
  • Whether the proposed development would comply with the limitations and conditions applicable to development permitted under Class AA of Schedule 2, Part 20 of the GPDO, namely the effect of the development on the character and appearance of the area
  • Whether the proposed development would comply with the limitations and conditions applicable to development permitted under Class AA of Schedule 2, Part 20 of the GPDO, namely the effect of the development on the living condition of the adjacent residential premises, by virtue of overlooking and loss of light

What decided it

The harmful effect on the external appearance of the building caused by the loss of the pitched roof, flat-roofed design and external materials, which would not accord with the Framework's requirement for upward extensions to be consistent with prevailing height and form and well-designed.

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

189 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Nottingham

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed28 October 20266012324
    291 Wigman Road, Nottingham, NG8 4AJ
  2. Dismissed23 October 20266012812
    27 Western Boulevard, Nottingham, NG8 1PE
  3. Dismissed22 October 20266012514
    3 Gordon Rise, Nottingham, NG3 5GB
  4. Dismissed19 October 20266015053
    Land At The Corner Of Radford Road And Gregory Boulevard, 85 - 87 Radford Road, Nottingham, NG7 5DR
  5. Allowed15 October 20266015651
    Land at 20 Daleside Road, Nottingham, NG2 4DH

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.