Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 June 20223273249

High Stoke, Holden Lane, Beauworth, Hampshire, SO24 0PB

Planning appeal 3273249 at High Stoke, Holden Lane, Beauworth, Hampshire, SO24 0PB (South Downs) was dismissed on 20 June 2022 by Inspector Jolly J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to its location within the South Downs National Park (SDNP).

for the demolition of the existing dwelling house and the removal of the existing tennis court. The erection of a 6 bedroom contemporary replacement dwelling house in a revised location. To include the laying of a driveway and forecourt, engineering works for the purpose of landscaping throughout the plot, the creation of a dew pond, and a new outside swimming pool to the rear with pool house

Authority
South Downs
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Jolly J
Postcode
SO24 0PB

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, having particular regard to its location within the South Downs National Park (SDNP)
  • the effect of the proposal on protected species (bats)

What decided it

The proposed development would not conserve or enhance the landscape character of the South Downs National Park and would appear as an incongruous feature in the rural setting, contrary to the development plan and NPPF requirements.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
SD1SD4SD5SD30SD9Policy 1Policy 50Policy 5
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 176Paragraph 130Paragraph 55Paragraph 56

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

1 other decided appeal within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in South Downs

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022

  1. Dismissed14 July 20266001892
    Empshott Grange, Church Lane, Empshott, Hampshire, GU33 6HT
  2. Dismissed23 June 20266001025
    Roman Mile Farm, Bignor Park Road, Bignor, West Sussex, RH20 1HQ
  3. Dismissed28 May 20266004671
    Reeves Britannia, 140 The Causeway, Petersfield, Hampshire, GU31 4LL
  4. Dismissed27 May 20266006395
    Weyridge, The Street, Binsted, Hampshire, GU34 4PF
  5. Dismissed11 May 20266000744
    17 High Street, Lewes, East Sussex, BN7 2LN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.