Planning appeal decision
2 Club Row, Eyam, HOPE VALLEY, S32 5QJ
take down outside toilet and coal house block
- Authority
- Peak District
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- other · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Cooper P
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the development on the Conservation Area
What decided it
The insufficient public benefits of creating a private parking space do not outweigh the less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area caused by the loss of part of the outbuilding structure.
The less than substantial harm to the Conservation Area was weighed against the public benefits of the proposal, and the balance tipped against the development as insufficient public benefits were demonstrated to outweigh the heritage harm.
Framework references: 202, 203
Plan policies cited: GSP1, GSP3, L3, DMC3, DMC5, DMC8, DMH8
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®