Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed30 May 20223273500

Land at Twyford Bury Lane , Twyford Bury , Bishops Stortford, Hertfordshire, CM22 7QA

removal of stables and change in land levels to allow for the erection of 1 dwelling submerged into ground with associated access, parking and landscaping works to include the creation of water features and landscaped terrace

Authority
East Hertfordshire District Council
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Chalk M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the development proposed would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt, including any effect on openness, having regard to the National Planning Policy Framework and any relevant development plan policies
  • The effect on the character and appearance of the area
  • Would the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal

What decided it

The very special circumstances arising from the medical needs of the appellant's family member were found to clearly outweigh the harm from inappropriate development and to the character and appearance of the area.

The substantial weight attributed to the cumulative harm from inappropriateness and character/appearance impact was clearly outweighed by the great weight given to the personal medical circumstances of the appellant's family member, amounting to very special circumstances justifying the development.

Framework references: 149

Plan policies cited: Policy GBR1, Policy DES2, Policy GIP2

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.