Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed25 September 20213273569

63 Ashridge Crescent, LONDON, SE18 3EA

the construction of a Zero Carbon Ground Floor side extension

Authority
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Westbrook J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed extension on the character and appearance of the Shrewsbury Park Estate Conservation Area

What decided it

The unsympathetic design and materials of the proposed extension would cause harm to the character and appearance of the host property and the wider conservation area that is not outweighed by any public benefits.

The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area was not outweighed by any public benefits, as sustainable construction methods could be achieved through alternative designs.

Plan policies cited: Policy DH1, Policy DH(a), Policy DH3, Policy DH(h)

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.