Planning appeal decision
Plot Opposite 1 Harrow Court, Stockbury, Kent, ME9 7UQ
a new 2 bedroom bungalow on vacant ground
- Authority
- Maidstone Borough Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Glassar S
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether or not the appeal site is an acceptable location for the development proposed, with specific regard to access to services
- The effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area, with particular regard to the Kent Downs Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB)
What decided it
The proposal conflicts with the development plan by locating a dwelling in an unsustainable location requiring car dependency and by causing harm to the character and appearance of the AONB, which cannot be outweighed by the limited benefits of a single dwelling in an area with demonstrable 5-year housing supply.
The benefits of providing one additional dwelling and efficient use of land, to which limited weight could be attached given the Council's 5-year housing supply, were outweighed by the substantial harm to character and appearance of the AONB and the conflict with the development plan requiring sustainable locations for new housing
Framework references: 176
Plan policies cited: Policy SS1, Policy SP17, Policy DM1, Policy DM30
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®