Planning appeal decision
Dismissed5 January 20223273944
First and Second Floors 200-202 Fore Street, London, N18 2JD
use of an HMO (7 residents)
- Authority
- London Borough of Enfield
- Appeal type
- ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Change of use
- Inspector
- Franks Z
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the Council's refusal to issue the certificate of lawfulness was well-founded
What decided it
The appellant failed to provide sufficiently clear, precise and unambiguous evidence to prove use as a 7-resident HMO for a substantially uninterrupted 10-year period prior to the application date.
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®