Planning appeal decision
84 Lower Ham Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT2 5BB
Planning appeal 3274059 at 84 Lower Ham Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT2 5BB (Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames) was dismissed on 17 November 2021 by Inspector O'Connor H, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including trees and whether the character or appearance of the Riverside North Conservation Area would be preserved or enhanced.
the demolition of the existing 3-storey building, previously converted into 2 flats, and the erection of a 4 storey building comprising 7 flats with associated basement accommodation, car parking and reconfigured access
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- O'Connor H
- Postcode
- KT2 5BB
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area, including trees and whether the character or appearance of the Riverside North Conservation Area would be preserved or enhanced
- The living conditions of existing residents at neighbouring buildings having regard to privacy
- Whether satisfactory living conditions would be created for future occupants having regard to the provision of outdoor space
- Flood risk
- If harm arises, whether this is outweighed by other material considerations
What decided it
The permanent harm to the significance of the Riverside North Conservation Area through loss of a building that positively contributes to its character, combined with unacceptable privacy harm to neighbouring residents and inadequately demonstrated flood risk mitigation, outweighed the moderate benefits of housing delivery.
The moderate weight given to the benefits of 5 additional dwellings and efficient use of previously developed land did not outweigh the great weight attributed to harm to the designated heritage asset, the significant harm to neighbouring residents' privacy, and the failure to adequately demonstrate flood risk mitigation; the tilted balance was not engaged due to clear reasons for refusal in heritage and flood risk policies.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy HC1Policy D3Policy D6Policy SI12Policy DM4Policy DM10Policy DM11Policy DM12Policy Guidance 2Policy Guidance 14Policy Guidance 16
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 124Paragraph 127Paragraph 130Paragraph 163Paragraph 167Paragraph 189Paragraph 194Paragraph 196Paragraph 199Paragraph 200Paragraph 202
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021
- Allowed23 October 2026601476713 Hawks Road, Kingston Upon Thames, KT1 3DS
- Dismissed16 October 20266005462150 Ewell Road, Surbiton, KT6 6HE
- Dismissed8 October 2026601404969 Sheephouse Way, New Malden, KT3 5PF
- Dismissed7 October 2026601191211 Kingsdowne Road, Surbiton, KT6 6JZ
- Dismissed6 October 20266009912Onslow House First Floor Flat, 1 Crummock Chase, Surbiton, KT6 4NP
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®