Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed6 September 20213274364

87 Queensway, WEST WICKHAM, BR4 9DT

a single storey rear extension, first floor side extension, insertion of windows into first floor flank elevation and loft conversion incorporating increase in ridge height of existing extension, rear dormer and side rooflights

Authority
London Borough of Bromley
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Somers J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed first floor rear roof extension and dormer window upon the character and appearance of the host building and the locality

What decided it

The proposed first floor rear roof extension and dormer would cause unacceptable detriment to the architectural authenticity and integrity of the existing building and the character and appearance of the surrounding locality, contrary to Local Plan Policies 6 and 37, whereas the single storey rear extension was modest and proportionate with no identified harm.

Plan policies cited: Policy 6, Policy 37

Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.