Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed11 November 20213274438

Area of Footpath, Fairbridge Road, Upper Holloway, London, N19 3HS

Planning appeal 3274438 at Area of Footpath, Fairbridge Road, Upper Holloway, London, N19 3HS (London Borough of Islington) was dismissed on 11 November 2021 by Inspector Baxter C, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

the erection of an 18 metre high Phase 8 telecommunications pole with built-in cabinet, 3no. separate cabinets and ancillary works

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
telecoms · Other minor developments
Inspector
Baxter C
Postcode
N19 3HS

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
  • highway safety with regards to footpath width

What decided it

The substantial harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area caused by the incongruous, dominating design and scale of the 18-metre telecommunications pole outweighed the public benefits of 5G installation, particularly given insufficient evidence that alternative sites or redesign had been properly explored.

The public benefits of 5G installation were outweighed by the substantial harm to the character and appearance of the surrounding area, as alternative options had not been fully explored.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy CS8 of the Islington's Core Strategy 2011Policy DM2.1 of the Islington's Local Plan: Development Management Policies 2013Policy DM2.7 of the Islington's Local Plan: Development Management Policies 2013Policy SI6 of the London Plan 2021

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

565 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Islington

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed9 September 20266007715
    Liverpool Road, Outside Waitrose, London, N1 0RW
  2. Dismissed9 September 20266007714
    Liverpool Road, Outside Waitrose, London, N1 0RW
  3. Dismissed4 September 20266008436
    Stroud Green Road, Outside No. 167, London, N4 3RN
  4. Dismissed4 September 20266008435
    Stroud Green Road, Outside No. 167, London, N4 3RN
  5. Dismissed10 August 20266009540
    Land Outside 251 Caledonian Rd, London, N1 1ED

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.