Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed21 December 20213274710

C D Mitchell Ltd, 64 South Street, Epsom, KT18 7PH

Planning appeal 3274710 at C D Mitchell Ltd, 64 South Street, Epsom, KT18 7PH (Epsom and Ewell Borough Council) was dismissed on 21 December 2021 by Inspector Chandler M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposal on existing employment land, having regard to the requirements of local policy.

Change of use from B1 Business to C3 Residential, including demolition of existing builders yard buildings. Construction of 6 number 2 storey, 2 bedroom dwellings

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Chandler M
Postcode
KT18 7PH

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • the effect of the proposal on existing employment land, having regard to the requirements of local policy
  • the living conditions for the occupants of neighbouring properties
  • controlled waters
  • local ecology

What decided it

The substantial and fundamental harm to the living conditions of neighbouring occupants, particularly the overbearing and oppressive impact on No 62 South Street, significantly and demonstrably outweighed the modest benefits of housing delivery, even under the tilted balance.

the modest benefits of housing supply and construction employment were significantly and demonstrably outweighed by the substantial harm to neighbouring living conditions and the unresolved risks to controlled waters

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy DM24Policy DM10Policy DM17Policy DM4
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

188 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Epsom and Ewell Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed29 October 20266011091
    20 Bradford Drive, Ewell, KT19 0AH
  2. Dismissed29 October 20266004732
    57-61 High Street, Ewell, KT17 1RX
  3. Dismissed6 October 20266010565
    Land To The Rear Of 11 Ruxley Close,, West Ewell, KT19 9ND
  4. Dismissed7 August 20266006401
    11 Danetree Road, West Ewell, KT19 9SA
  5. Quashed On Legal Grounds30 July 20263361942
    The Land Known As 11 Woodlands Road, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 7HW

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.