Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed1 December 20213274722

50-54 Church Hill, Southgate, N21 1JA

Planning appeal 3274722 at 50-54 Church Hill, Southgate, N21 1JA (London Borough of Enfield) was dismissed on 1 December 2021 by Inspector Chalk M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposed development on the character or appearance of the Winchmore Hill Green Conservation Area including the effect on trees, and on the setting of the nearby listed St Paul's Church.

erection of three detached, 4-bedroom dwelling houses, together with associated parking, access, and landscape improvements

Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Minor Dwellings
Inspector
Chalk M
Postcode
N21 1JA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposed development on the character or appearance of the Winchmore Hill Green Conservation Area including the effect on trees, and on the setting of the nearby listed St Paul's Church
  • The effect on biodiversity

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the significance of the conservation area and the setting of the listed building, to which great weight must be given under the Framework, was not outweighed by the housing and sustainability benefits of the proposal.

The significant benefits of housing delivery and sustainability in a location with good services and transport links were outweighed by the great weight to be given to the conservation of the designated heritage assets, notwithstanding that the harm was less than substantial.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy D4Policy HC1Policy G7Policy G6Policy DMD 37Policy DMD 44Policy DMD 80Policy DMD 81Policy DMD 78Policy DMD 79Policy CP30Policy CP31Policy CP36

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

504 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Enfield

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Dismissed27 October 20266012855
    77 Conway Road, London, N14 7BD
  2. Dismissed21 October 20266010541
    2 Queen Annes Grove, Enfield, EN1 2JP
  3. Allowed20 October 20266009773
    28 Wolves Lane, London, N13 6DR
  4. Dismissed29 September 20266010207
    61 Hawthorn Road, London, N18 1EY
  5. Dismissed28 September 20266012598
    21 Merrivale, London, N14 4TE

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.