Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed10 August 20213274848

49 Shepiston Lane, HAYES, UB3 1LL

erection of ground floor side and part first side extension in tandem with 47 Shepiston Lane

Authority
London Borough of Hillingdon
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Mulloy C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area

What decided it

The proposal would harm the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area by failing to appear subservient to the main dwelling and by causing an inevitable loss of openness on a prominent corner, conflicting with Policies BE1, DMHD 1, DMHB 11 and DMHB 12.

The benefits to the appellant of providing additional living accommodation in an accessible location would not outweigh the significant harm identified to character and appearance.

Plan policies cited: Policy BE1 of the Hillingdon Local Plan: Part 1 – Strategic Policies (2019), Policy DMHD 1 of the Council's Local Plan Part Two – Development Management Policies, Policy DMHB 11 of the Local Plan Part Two – Development Management Policies, Policy DMHB 12 of the Local Plan Part Two – Development Management Policies

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.