®Planning appeal decision
Flats 8 and 9, 32-34 Danbury Street, London, N1 8JU
erection of roof extension and alterations to existing third floor elevations
- Authority
- London Borough of Islington
- Appeal type
- householder · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Senior H
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host and neighbouring dwellings and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Duncan Terrace/Colebrooke Row Conservation Area
What decided it
The less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the conservation area was not outweighed by the private benefits of additional living accommodation and outdoor space, which do not constitute public benefits under paragraph 202 of the Framework.
The less than substantial harm to the conservation area was weighed against the private benefits of additional living accommodation and outdoor space, which were found insufficient to outweigh the harm.
Framework references: 202
Plan policies cited: CS8, CS9, DM2.1, DM2.3, D1, D4, HC1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.