®Planning appeal decision
12 Spring Valley Croft, Bramley, LEEDS, LS13 4RP
a single storey extension 6000mm from the original rear house wall and not exceeding 3000mm in height
- Authority
- Leeds City Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Wraight G
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- The impact of the proposed development on the amenity of adjoining premises
What decided it
The single storey design with limited height relative to the existing dwelling eaves meant the extension would not cause harm to the amenity of adjoining premises, particularly regarding daylight, sunlight, and overbearing impact.
Plan policies cited: Policy P10 of the Leeds Core Strategy 2019, Saved Policy GP5 of the Revised Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review 2006, Saved Policy BD6 of the Revised Leeds Unitary Development Plan Review 2006, Policy HDG2 of the Householder Design Guide Supplementary Planning Document 2012
Judgments cited: Bernard Wheatcroft Ltd v SSE [JPL 1982 P37]
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.