Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision9 September 20213275020

Midland Truck & Van, Neachells Lane, WOLVERHAMPTON, WV13 3RP

the removal of 4no existing illuminated 48-sheet advertisement displays and replacement with 2no illuminated 48-sheet digital advertisement displays

Authority
Wolverhampton City Council
Appeal type
commercial · Commercial Appeal Service (CAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
advertisement · Other minor developments
Inspector
Longmuir J

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the amenity of the opposite semi-detached dwellings: Ivydene and Meltona

What decided it

The south-facing advertisement display would cause unacceptable harm to the living conditions of the opposite dwellings through the disturbing effect of the changing digital display, which could not be adequately mitigated by conditions.

The economic importance of advertisement displays was outweighed by the harm to the living conditions of the dwellings in respect of the south-facing display, but the north-facing display was acceptable as it caused no such harm.

Framework references: 136

Plan policies cited: D4, D7, D8, D9, EP19, ENV3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.