Planning appeal decision
Willow Tree House Brookers Hill, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9BX
Planning appeal 3275086 at Willow Tree House Brookers Hill, Shinfield, Reading, RG2 9BX (Wokingham Borough Council) was dismissed on 18 February 2022 by Inspector Pipkin R, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area.
full application for a mixed use development comprising the proposed erection of 23 dwellings and community hall with vehicular access off Brookers Hill and pedestrian and cycle access from Hollow Lane together with open space and landscaping
- Authority
- Wokingham Borough Council
- Appeal type
- major · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Major dwellings
- Inspector
- Pipkin R
- Postcode
- RG2 9BX
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- the effect of the proposed development on the character and appearance of the area
- the effect of the proposed development on protected trees
- whether there are any material considerations which mean that the decision should be made otherwise than in accordance with the development plan
What decided it
The significant/substantial harm to landscape character, appearance and protected trees was found to significantly and demonstrably outweigh the benefits, including the moderate weight attached to the tilted balance.
The substantial weight given to harm to character, appearance and protected trees significantly and demonstrably outweighed the moderate-to-significant benefits (including the tilted balance arising from the absence of a 5YHLS and out-of-date policies), so the balance tipped against the development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CP1 (CS)Policy CP2 (CS)Policy CP3 (CS)Policy CP4 (CS)Policy CP5 (CS)Policy CP6 (CS)Policy CP7 (CS)Policy CP9 (CS)Policy CP11 (CS)Policy CP17 (CS)Policy CP19 (CS)Policy CC01 (MDD LP)Policy CC02 (MDD LP)Policy CC03 (MDD LP)Policy CC06 (MDD LP)Policy CC07 (MDD LP)Policy TB05 (MDD LP)Policy TB12 (MDD LP)Policy TB21 (MDD LP)Policy TB23 (MDD LP)Policy 1 (SNP)Policy 2 (SNP)Policy 4 (SNP)Policy 5 (SNP)Policy 6 (SNP)Policy 7 (SNP)
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 11Paragraph 56Paragraph 64Paragraph 71Paragraph 110Paragraph 219
- Judgments
- Wavendon Properties Ltd vs SSCLG and Milton Keynes Council [2019] EWHC 1524 (Admin); Bloor Homes Ltd v SSCLG [2014] EWHC 745 (Admin); Gladman Developments v SS & Central Bedfordshire Council [2019] EWHC 127 (Admin); Eastleigh Borough Council v SSHCLG [2019] EWHC 1862 (Admin); Suffolk Coastal District Council v Hopkins Development Ltd [2017] UKSC 37; Gladman Developments Limited v Daventry District Council and SSCLG [2016] EWCA Civ 2246; East Northamptonshire Council v SSHCLG, Case Number: CO/917/2020
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in Wokingham Borough Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed8 June 20263371069Land North of Reading Road, Arborfield, RG2 9HN
- Notice varied and upheld1 May 20263346384Old Billingbear Brickworks, Carters Hill, Binfield, Wokingham, RG40 5RS
- Notice upheld10 March 20263374730Land at Gravelley Bridge Farm, Grazeley Green Road, Grazeley, Reading, RG7 1LG
- Allowed26 January 20263374952Unit 10, Land at Headley Road East, Woodley, RG5 4SN
- Allowed16 June 20253339712Land to South of, Gazelle Close, Winnersh, Wokingham, RG41 5HH
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®