Planning appeal decision
Bishops Stortford Lawn Tennis Club, Cricketfield Lane, Bishops Stortford, Herts, CM23 2TD
Planning appeal 3275195 at Bishops Stortford Lawn Tennis Club, Cricketfield Lane, Bishops Stortford, Herts, CM23 2TD (East Hertfordshire District Council) was allowed on 16 March 2022 by Inspector Chandler M, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposals would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt.
Construction of two padel courts with canopy over & with associated floodlights & external works
- Authority
- East Hertfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- leisure-sport · Other minor developments
- Inspector
- Chandler M
- Postcode
- CM23 2TD
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether the proposals would constitute inappropriate development in the Green Belt
- the effect on the character and appearance of the surrounding area
- whether the proposals make appropriate provision for car parking, and if not, the effect of any under provision
- whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, would be clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances required to justify the proposal (Appeal A only)
What decided it
For Appeal A, the very substantial weight attributed to the benefits of promoting physical and mental well-being through access to padel sport facilities clearly outweighed the limited harm to Green Belt openness, satisfying the very special circumstances test. For Appeal B, the proposal did not constitute inappropriate development as it preserved Green Belt openness.
Appeal A: the limited harm to Green Belt openness (given substantial weight at the lower end of the spectrum) was clearly outweighed by the very substantial benefits to community health and well-being from promoting participation in padel sport, satisfying very special circumstances. Appeal B: no balancing exercise required as the proposal did not constitute inappropriate development.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy GB1Policy DES2Policy DES3Policy DES4Policy TRA3
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 143Paragraph 98Paragraph 148
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Hertfordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed28 October 20266008487The Ranch House, Amwell Hill, Great Amwell, Ware, SG12 9QZ
- Allowed14 October 2026601275023 Bishops Road, Tewin Wood, Tewin, AL6 0NP
- Dismissed28 September 20266006224Land Near Fanshawes Ware Park, Ware, SG12 0DX
- Dismissed25 September 20266006716Little Orchard, London Road, Spellbrook, Hertfordshire, CM23 4BA
- Allowed24 September 20266008238Land North of A507, West of A10, Buntingford, Buntingford, SG9 9ER
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®