Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed9 December 20223275236

11 Valley Fields Crescent, ENFIELD, EN2 7QB

the construction of a single storey rear extension together with internal alterations and replacing front double door with single door and window. Conversion of existing garage into outbuilding (ancillary to main house), removal of garage door and insertion of single door and window

Authority
London Borough of Enfield
Appeal type
ldc · Lawful Development Certificate
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Watson S

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the Council's decision to refuse the certificate of lawful use or development was well founded, turning on whether the proposed works would have constituted permitted development under Article 3 and Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 as amended

What decided it

The proposed extension would exceed the 3 metre eaves height limitation under limitation (i) of Schedule 2, Part 1, Class A of the GPDO when measured from the highest part of ground adjacent to the extension, and would also breach the eaves height requirement under limitation (d).

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.