Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed31 March 20223275309

72 LOWER ADDISCOMBE ROAD, CROYDON, CR0 6AB

Extensions to building to deliver nine new dwellings

Authority
London Borough of Croydon
Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Hearing
Development
residential · Other Major Developments
Inspector
Russell M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the area
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of future occupiers of the host building with particular regard to outlook, light and access
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of neighbouring residential occupiers on Lower Addiscombe Road with particular regard to privacy and light
  • Whether the proposed parking layout would be safe, secure and efficient
  • Whether the proposal makes adequate provision for any necessary developer contributions arising from the development

What decided it

The significant harm to the living conditions of future occupiers of the host building (outlook and access) and to the privacy of neighbouring occupiers at Nos 74-80 Lower Addiscombe Road, for which no acceptable solution was before the Inspector.

The significant harm to living conditions of future occupiers and neighbouring occupiers, causing conflict with the development plan as a whole, was not outweighed by the acceptable design, safe parking layout and secured transport contributions, so the appeal was dismissed.

Framework references: 11, 12, 56, 125

Plan policies cited: Policy D3, Policy D4, Policy D6, Policy DM10, Policy DM29, Policy DM30, Policy DM35, Policy SP2.8, Policy SP4, Policy SP6, Policy T4, Policy T9

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.