Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed26 October 20213275728

2B, 2C, 2D and 2E, Shaa Road, Acton, W3 7LN

single storey conservatory style wintergarden extensions to 2B, 2C, 2D and 2E

Authority
London Borough of Ealing
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Rafferty C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Acton Park Conservation Area

What decided it

The absence of any public benefits that would outweigh the less than substantial harm to the conservation area's character and appearance caused by the visually intrusive extensions.

Less than substantial harm to the conservation area was not outweighed by any public benefits, as the appellant failed to demonstrate material public benefits capable of justifying the harm.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: London Plan 2021 Policy D3, London Plan 2021 Policy D4, London Plan 2021 Policy HC1, Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document December 2013 Policy 7.4, Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document December 2013 Policy 7B, Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document December 2013 Policy 7C, Ealing Development Management Development Plan Document December 2013 Policy 7D

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.