Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed29 November 20213276095

Land East of A650, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF1 2UZ

Planning appeal 3276095 at Land East of A650, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF1 2UZ (Wakefield Metropolitan District Council) was allowed on 29 November 2021 by Inspector Worthington E, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area.

the erection of a builder’s merchants (storage, distribution, trade counter, offices and ancillary retail sale), car parking, servicing and other associated works

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
employment-industrial · Major retail and services
Inspector
Worthington E

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the surrounding area

What decided it

The economic benefits of the proposal in terms of new jobs and investment were sufficient to outweigh the limited conflict with Local Plan Policy SPA1, in the absence of any other harm arising from the proposal.

The limited conflict with Local Plan Policy SPA1 in terms of use was outweighed by the economic benefits of new jobs and investment and the absence of any other material harm to character, appearance, living conditions, highway safety, drainage or heritage assets.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
Policy SPA1Policy CS10Policy D9Policy D14Policy D15Policy D27Policy D28Policy CS14
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 11Paragraph 92Paragraph 112Paragraph 113Paragraph 126Paragraph 134Paragraph 157

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

84 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Wakefield Metropolitan District Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed14 September 20266006811
    Hall Croft House, Castleford Road, Normanton, WF6 2DN
  2. Notice varied and upheld24 August 20263361281
    Wragby Grange, Doncaster Road, Wragby, Wakefield, West Yorkshire, WF4 1QX
  3. Allowed10 July 20266006858
    Land at, Pontefract Road, Pontefract, WF11 8RJ
  4. Allowed2 July 20263368025
    Land South of Wakefield B Substation, And East of Neil Fox Way, Wakefield, WF1 5DB
  5. Dismissed30 June 20266005423
    Land off Lee Moor Lane, Stanley, Wakefield, WF3 4EU

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.