Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed18 February 20223276227

Land to rear of 28 Nunhead Green , London, SE15 3QF

a change of use of the rear part of an existing bar ‘El Vermut’ (Class Sui Generis) to residential floorspace (Class C3) together with a rear extension at first floor to create a new 1 bed maisonette

Authority
London Borough of Southwark
Appeal type
minor · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Other minor developments
Inspector
Ollerenshaw M

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development proposed on the character and appearance of the host property and the surrounding area, including whether or not it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Nunhead Green Conservation Area
  • The effect of the proposal on the viability of the bar
  • The effect of the proposal on the living conditions of the neighbouring occupiers of the first floor flat at 28 Nunhead Green, with particular regard to outlook
  • Whether the proposal would provide for a satisfactory standard of accommodation for occupiers of the proposed maisonette, with regard to outlook and provision of external amenity space

What decided it

The unacceptable harm to the character and appearance of the Conservation Area caused by the dominant bulk and massing of the proposed extension, combined with the failure to demonstrate that the proposal would not undermine the viability of the bar, outweighed the limited public benefits.

Framework references: 48, 199, 93, 202

Plan policies cited: Policy 3.12, Policy 3.13, Policy 3.15, Policy 3.16, Policy 3.18, Strategic Policy 12, Policy D4, Policy HC7, Policy 41, Policy D5, Policy 5.2, Strategic Policy 5, Policy 4.2, Policy D6

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.