Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed20 December 20213276229

Land at Church Street, Effingham, Leatherhead, KT24 5NA

Planning appeal 3276229 at Land at Church Street, Effingham, Leatherhead, KT24 5NA (Guildford Borough Council) was dismissed on 20 December 2021 by Inspector Jolly J, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Effingham Conservation Area and the setting of the surrounding listed buildings.

for the erection of 17 No dwellings plus access, parking and landscaping

Appeal type
major · Planning Appeal
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Major dwellings
Inspector
Jolly J
Postcode
KT24 5NA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Effingham Conservation Area and the setting of the surrounding listed buildings
  • housing mix
  • planning obligations

What decided it

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area and the significance and setting of listed buildings, when balanced against the identified benefits, was not outweighed by those benefits, and the proposal conflicted with the development plan.

the less than substantial harm to the conservation area and the significance and setting of listed buildings was not outweighed by the benefits of housing delivery, affordable housing provision, economic benefits, and other environmental and infrastructure benefits

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
ENP-SA1ENP-G2ENP-H2D1D3G5HE4HE6HE7HE10H1ID1ID3
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 199Paragraph 202

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

79 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in Guildford Borough Council

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Allowed20 October 20266013901
    Anchor House, Station Row, Shalford, GU4 8BY
  2. Dismissed19 October 20266014001
    32 Fairborne Way, Guildford, gu29gb
  3. decided16 October 20266010712
    9 Baldwin Crescent, Guildford, GU4 7XW
  4. Allowed15 October 20266009940
    Store Rear of 4 Station Parade, Ockham Road South, East Horsley, KT24 6QN
  5. Allowed15 October 20266008529
    Shortland Farm, Guildford Road, Ash, GU12 6DF

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.