Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed4 November 20213276405

34 St Peter's Street, Islington, London, N1 8JT

proposed mansard roof extension

Authority
London Borough of Islington
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Senior H

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the proposal on the character and appearance of the host and neighbouring dwellings and whether it would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Duncan Terrace/Colebrooke Row Conservation Area

What decided it

The proposed mansard roof extension would cause less than substantial harm to the character and appearance of the Duncan Terrace/Colebrooke Row Conservation Area as a designated heritage asset, and the private benefit of additional living accommodation does not constitute a public benefit sufficient to outweigh this harm.

The less than substantial harm to the conservation area was weighed against the public benefits of the proposal, but the private benefit of additional living accommodation was not sufficient to outweigh the heritage harm.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: CS8, CS9, DM2.1, DM2.3

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.