Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Planning permission granted26 October 20213276468

45 Ruskin Walk, London, SE24 9NA

Planning appeal 3276468 at 45 Ruskin Walk, London, SE24 9NA (London Borough of Southwark) was allowed on 26 October 2021 by Inspector Satheesan R, by written representations. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: The effect of the development on the living conditions for the occupiers of 43 Ruskin Walk, with particular regard to light, overshadowing and outlook.

without planning permission, the construction of a fence along the north western boundary to the rear of the Property which when combined with the dwarf wall exceeds the height permitted by the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 (as amended) and which is shown in the approximate position marked in blue on the attached plan (“the Unauthorised Development”)

Appeal type
enforcement · Enforcement Notice
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Satheesan R
Postcode
SE24 9NA

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • The effect of the development on the living conditions for the occupiers of 43 Ruskin Walk, with particular regard to light, overshadowing and outlook

What decided it

The difference in land levels between the two properties, with No. 43 being noticeably higher than No. 45, reduces the fence's impact such that it causes no harmful overshadowing, loss of light or outlook to neighbouring occupiers.

What the Inspector cited

Development plan policies
saved policy 3.2 of the Southwark Plan (2007)strategic policy 13 of the Southwark Council Core Strategy (2011)
National Planning Policy Framework
Paragraph 130

How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.

See how each was applied

The decision letter

Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.

With an account

What an account adds to this decision

419 other decided appeals within two kilometres of this site. In the app every dot opens its decision, and its letter wherever one was published, and you can draw your own site to see what has been decided around it.AllowedDismissedSplitThis decision
An appeal decision in the app, with the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out beside the letter
Every letter, there to read. We pick out the main issues, the policies and the judgments cited, so you can work through the letter faster.
Searching the full text of appeal decision letters in the app
Search inside every letter. By words or by meaning, filtered by authority, outcome, appeal type and procedure, with every locatable decision on the map and the Inspector named on each.
Start your free trial

More decisions in London Borough of Southwark

The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2021

  1. Notice upheld7 April 20263361416
    12 Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8RZ
  2. Dismissed7 April 20263344253
    Flat 1, 12 Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8RZ
  3. Notice varied and upheld5 February 20263364196
    211 Walworth Road, London, SE17 1RL
  4. Notice varied and upheld7 January 20263354856
    96 Goodrich Road, London, SE22 0ER
  5. Notice upheld7 January 20263337227
    32 Meeting House Lane, London, SE15 2UN

The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every appeal around it, with its letter to read and the main issues, policies and judgments cited picked out.