Planning appeal decision
5 Bell Square, Marshfield, SN14 8HS
the construction of two dormer windows and a canopy
- Authority
- South Gloucestershire Council
- Appeal type
- householder · Householder (HAS)
- Procedure
- Written Representations
- Development
- residential · Householder developments
- Inspector
- Glaister C
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Marshfield Conservation Area
What decided it
The single dormer window and rooflights in the revised plans would preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area by reflecting the existing dormer window and causing only minor visual impact, whereas the canopy extension's modern aluminium materials would be incongruous and the two original dormer windows would create visual clutter and imbalance on the roofscape.
The less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area from the canopy extension and original dormer windows was not outweighed by any substantive public benefits, resulting in dismissal of those elements; the revised single dormer window and rooflights caused no harm and were therefore allowed.
Framework references: 199
Plan policies cited: Policy CS1, Policy CS9, Policy PSP1
The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®