Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Split Decision17 September 20213276775

5 Bell Square, Marshfield, SN14 8HS

the construction of two dormer windows and a canopy

Authority
South Gloucestershire Council
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
residential · Householder developments
Inspector
Glaister C

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would preserve or enhance the character or appearance of the Marshfield Conservation Area

What decided it

The single dormer window and rooflights in the revised plans would preserve the character and appearance of the conservation area by reflecting the existing dormer window and causing only minor visual impact, whereas the canopy extension's modern aluminium materials would be incongruous and the two original dormer windows would create visual clutter and imbalance on the roofscape.

The less-than-substantial harm to the conservation area from the canopy extension and original dormer windows was not outweighed by any substantive public benefits, resulting in dismissal of those elements; the revised single dormer window and rooflights caused no harm and were therefore allowed.

Framework references: 199

Plan policies cited: Policy CS1, Policy CS9, Policy PSP1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.