Planning appeal decision
Toad Hall, Sacombe Green, Sacombe, Ware, SG12 0JQ
Planning appeal 3276833 at Toad Hall, Sacombe Green, Sacombe, Ware, SG12 0JQ (East Hertfordshire District Council) was dismissed on 28 February 2022 by Inspector Szymanski D, following a hearing. The main issue, as the Inspector framed it: whether or not the proposed development is compliant with policies for the protection and development of equestrian facilities.
Creation of 4x three-bedroom dwellings and 4x B1 office use units and associated car parking
- Authority
- East Hertfordshire District Council
- Appeal type
- minor · Planning Appeal
- Procedure
- Hearing
- Development
- residential · Minor Dwellings
- Inspector
- Szymanski D
- Postcode
- SG12 0JQ
Main issues, as the Inspector framed them
- whether or not the proposed development is compliant with policies for the protection and development of equestrian facilities
- whether or not the proposed development would be in a suitable location having regard to its location in the countryside and the accessibility of services and facilities
- the effect of the proposed development upon the character and appearance of the area
- whether or not the proposed development would provide suitable living conditions for the future occupiers of houses 1 and 2 with particular reference to the adequacy of private outdoor space provision
What decided it
The cumulative harm from loss of the equestrian facility, poor accessibility of the location, harm to character and appearance, and unsatisfactory private outdoor space for future occupiers was found to attract significant weight that outweighed the moderate benefits of the scheme.
The significant weight attached to the harms (loss of equestrian use, poor locational sustainability, harm to character and appearance, and unsatisfactory living conditions) outweighed the moderate benefits of housing, employment and environmental gains, so the appeal was dismissed.
What the Inspector cited
- Development plan policies
- Policy CFLR6Policy ED1Policy ED2Policy ED4Policy DPS2Policy VILL3Policy GBR2Policy DES4Policy DES3Policy TRA1
- National Planning Policy Framework
- Paragraph 79Paragraph 80Paragraph 104Paragraph 105Paragraph 130
How the Inspector dealt with each one is set out in the app, in order: the development plan, national policy, housing land supply, other considerations and the planning balance, beside the letter.
See how each was appliedThe decision letter
Town Planner Pro holds this letter. The Appeals plan opens it and every other letter we hold, all of them searchable, with the main issues and what decided each case picked out. We do not show letters on the free site because they carry people’s names and addresses.
With an account
What an account adds to this decision


More decisions in East Hertfordshire District Council
The authority’s record since 2016 · every decision in 2022
- Allowed24 September 20266008238Land North of A507, West of A10, Buntingford, Buntingford, SG9 9ER
- Dismissed17 November 2025337137512 Hallingbury Road, Bishop's Stortford, Hertfordshire, CM23 5LA
- Allowed17 November 2025337088993 St Margarets Road , Ware, SG12 8ER
- Dismissed3 July 20243330239Woodland Grove, Waterford, Hertford, Hertfordshire, SG14 3FQ
- Dismissed5 April 2024333616010 Henderson Place, Hertford, SG13 8GA
The main issues, what decided it, the planning balance and the policies and judgments listed as cited are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro and are our summary, not the Inspector’s words; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.
®