Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Dismissed24 January 20223276911

94 South Hill Park, LONDON, NW3 2SN

erection of a side extension at first floor level to facilitate lift; enlargement of ground floor rear roof terrace; alterations to rear ground fenestration; formation of new second floor rear roof terrace

Authority
London Borough of Camden
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
extension · Householder developments
Inspector
Nilsson A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposed side extension would preserve or enhance the character and appearance of the South Hill Park Conservation Area
  • The effect of the ground floor rear roof terrace on the living conditions of the occupants of 92 South Hill Park with regard to privacy

What decided it

The harm to the South Hill Park Conservation Area through loss of important views and unbalancing of the semi-detached pair, combined with the unacceptable privacy impact on the neighbouring property, was not outweighed by the accessibility benefits sought.

Framework references: 202

Plan policies cited: Policy D1, Policy D2, Policy DH1, Policy DH2, Policy A1

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.