Town Planner Pro
Search appeal decisions

Planning appeal decision

Allowed29 July 20213277062

11 Trouthall Lane, Plumley, Knutsford, WA16 0UN

the installation of an open fronted car port and log store

Authority
Cheshire East
Appeal type
householder · Householder (HAS)
Procedure
Written Representations
Development
other · Householder developments
Inspector
Partington A

Main issues, as the Inspector framed them

  • Whether the proposal would be inappropriate development in the Green Belt for the purposes of the development plan and the Framework
  • The effect of the proposal on the openness of the Green Belt
  • If the proposal is inappropriate development, whether the harm by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations so as to amount to the very special circumstances necessary to justify it

What decided it

The proposal would not be a prominent feature in the street scene and would not have a detrimental impact on the character and appearance of the area or countryside, therefore falling within the exceptions to inappropriate development in the Green Belt.

Framework references: 149

Plan policies cited: Policy PG3 of the Cheshire East Local Plan Strategy, Saved Policy GC12 of the Macclesfield Borough Local Plan

The main issues and the deciding factor are read from the published letter by Town Planner Pro; the letter itself is the record. Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Research, not advice.

In the app this decision sits on the map beside every other appeal around it, with the full reasoning summary, the letter held on file, and the case law it applies.